Personal tools
You are here: Home Management Practices Monitoring water quality
Document Actions

Monitoring water quality

last modified 2009-09-07 16:25

Monitoring of the quality of water utilised on-farm and/or leaving the farm.

 


Purpose

To gauge the suitability of water used on-fram for its intended purpose and to ensure that any water leaving the farm will not be of a quality that negatively effects off-farm water resources, the environment and other water users.

 

Components targeted:                        Water quality; Surface water nitrogen; Surface water phosphorus.                                                                       

Components that may be affected:     Biodiversity conservation; Cultural (non-material) services; Soil nitrogen;

                                                            Soil phosphorus; Soil acidity and Soil salinity

Indicator

Percentage of farmers monitoring water quality on their property.

Results

The 2001-02 Resource Management Survey, carried out by the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics (ABARE), estimated that the operators of 34 per cent of broadacre and dairy industry farms in the wheat/sheep zone considered poor water quality a significant problem. An estimated 91 per cent found that poor water quality impacted on management, production, returns or costs, while 85 per cent made changes in 2001-02 in their land management practices due to poor water quality. 14 per cent of the farms showed signs of poor water quality (ABARE 2002). The survey is carried out intermittently and may be repeated in the future (Nelson et al. 2004). Additional survey data from research and development corporations and grower groups may be available.

Table 1: Estimated percentage of farms aware/taking measures to combat degradation problems

Management problem + practice

Farms (%)

RSE (%)

Significant problem - poor water quality

34

17

Impacted on business - poor water quality

91

8

Made changes due to poor water quality

85

19

Signs of poor water quality

14

13

Source- ABARE 2001-02 Resource Management Survey. 

Note: RSE = Relative standard error; Population (farms) = 38502,  Sample (farms) = 579

more

VARIABLE

DESCRIPTION

Population

Estimated number of broadacre and dairy industry farms in the selected category with an EVAO greater than $22 500.

Sample

Number of broadacre and dairy industry farms that responded to questions in the 2001-02 Resource Management supplementary in the selected category.

Significant problem - poor water quality

Was poor water quality a significant problem during 2001-02?

Impacted on business - poor water quality

Poor water quality impacted on management, production, returns or costs

Made changes - poor water quality

Changed land management practices on farm because of poor water quality

Signs of - poor water quality

Any signs of poor water quality on farm during 2001-02?

References

ABARE (2002) 2001-02 Resource Management Survey: Data Package 2001-02. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Canberra. Website- http://www.abareconomics.com/ame/lrm2/lrmalt.asp. Accessed 14/05/2007.

 

Nelson, R., Alexander, F., Elliston, L. and Blias, A. (2004) 2001-02 Resource Management Survey:Natural Resource Management on Australian Farms report. Austalian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Canberra. Website- http://abareonlineshop.com/PdfFiles/PC12675.pdf. Accessed 14/05/2007. 

 

 

 

To return to previous page click back button on your browser


Powered by Plone, the Open Source Content Management System

This site conforms to the following standards: